AT&T Tech Support 360
- Related Stories
-
Fired up about Firefox 1.0
November 11, 2004 -
Google stars in Firefox's new browser
November 11, 2004 -
Microsoft says Firefox not a threat to IE
November 11, 2004 -
Firefox in the hunt for dollars, downloads
November 1, 2004 -
Study: Firefox still gaining on Internet Explorer
November 1, 2004 -
Amazon's A9 toolbar now available for Firefox
November 1, 2004 -
Firefox nears final launch
October 28, 2004 -
Firefox smashes funding target
October 22, 2004 -
Major browsers bitten by security bugs
October 20, 2004 -
Firefox fans to take campaign to NY Times
October 20, 2004 -
This week in Netscape news
October 15, 2004 -
A decade on the Web with Netscape
October 13, 2004 -
AOL prepares its own browser
October 8, 2004 -
Piggyback developers in a bind over IE
October 7, 2004 -
Andreessen: IE faces one-two punch
October 6, 2004 -
Firefox beats million-download deadline
September 20, 2004 -
Open source under the microscope
January 5, 2004
OneStat.com, an Amsterdam, Netherlands-based provider of Web traffic measurement services, said that according to numbers gleaned from 2 million Web surfers around the world, the Mozilla Foundation's new Firefox releases appear to be cutting into Microsoft's still commanding lead in the browser market.
"It seems that people are switching from Microsoft's Internet Explorer to Mozilla's new Firefox browser," Niels Brinkman, OneStat.com co-founder, said in a statement.
OneStat's statistics, based on the Web surfers' activity in 100 countries, showed that IE's market share slipped to 88.9 percent in the third week of November, down 5 percentage points from its share in May.
Mozilla-based browsers, including Firefox, rose to 7.4 percent, up 5 percentage points from May.
The new figures come on the heels of another survey that showed IE on a downward trend. Earlier this month, WebSideStory reported that IE was continuing to slip, claiming 92.9 percent of Web surfers in October versus 95.5 percent in June.
Mozilla heralded its download numbers as a sign of progress for the open-source browser.
"We're seeing a much swifter uptake for 1.0 than for the preview release, which took more than a month to reach 5 million downloads," Asa Dotzler, Mozilla's release manager, said in a statement. "We're clearly reaching a new world of users and we're doing it at a faster pace than any time in Mozilla's history."
In addition to the increase in downloads, Firefox can look forward to retail sales in the form of a new offering by Linspire, the open-source software distributor, which said Monday it had unveiled a product called "OOoFf" that combines the open-source productivity software suite OpenOffice.org with Firefox.
The software package, available now from the OOoFf Web site, is available for use with the Microsoft Windows, Apple Macintosh and Linux operating systems. It costs $29.95 when ordered online, with free shipping. It also will be sold at retail stores, according to Linspire.
Firefox advances aside, Microsoft threw cold water on the OneStat.com numbers, saying they failed to account for IE's stronghold in the corporate world.
"It doesn't jibe with what WebSideStory shows, and what neither of these count is corporate intranets where users aren't actually hitting the Web," said Gary Schare, Microsoft's director of product management for Windows.
Schare attributed Mozilla's spike in popularity to interest by "early adopters," and predicted that in the end IE would retain its majority status.
"I still believe in the end that most users will decide that IE is the best choice when they take into account all the factors that led them to choose IE in the first place," Schare said. "Meanwhile, we're happy that they're primarily (using Firefox) on Windows, and that Firefox is part of the large ecosystem of software products available on the Windows platform."
See more CNET content tagged:
OneStat,
Mozilla Corp.,
Firefox,
WebSideStory Inc.,
Linspire
""I still believe in the end that most users will decide that IE is the best choice when they take into account all the factors that led them to choose IE in the first place," Schare said."
Nothing actually led them to choose IE in the first place. Microsoft with the leading OS of Windows, in account of 90% of the population of PC users - has made IE part of its system. I may say that people who are lazy may choose IE or people who dont see the trend in the constant vulnerabilities. 19 vulnerabilities just this month in IE 6.0. If people were announced these then I think things would change much faster. Mozilla firefox I think will some day come the browser that the majority uses.
""I still believe in the end that most users will decide that IE is the best choice when they take into account all the factors that led them to choose IE in the first place," Schare said."
Nothing actually led them to choose IE in the first place. Microsoft with the leading OS of Windows, in account of 90% of the population of PC users - has made IE part of its system. I may say that people who are lazy may choose IE or people who dont see the trend in the constant vulnerabilities. 19 vulnerabilities just this month in IE 6.0. If people were announced these then I think things would change much faster. Mozilla firefox I think will some day come the browser that the majority uses.
They truly are clueless. Lack of choices of preinstalled browsers is what made most people 'choose' IE. What a joke. IE has NOTHING to offer over firefox or safari, nothing.
I can see IE's dominance in business drop like a rock in the next 2 years, with more and more businesses choosing much more secure mac or open source options over the massive amounts of holes in MS garbage. Business have paid through the arse for non-stop security updates and licensing, and are tired of it.
Even on the consumer side, open source and mac are garning a lot of interest. People are finally waking up, and not accepting garbage anymore.
What choice? it came with windows. Ive only been useing firefox for a year and I'm completly delighted with it. I recently used ie again after my sp2 update and found it to be more annoying than ever. Most people who come to me with browser problems dont know there is anything other than ie, and a lot of the user% will be business users who are not allowed to install anything on the work machines or be fired and just use the browser that came with windows.
They truly are clueless. Lack of choices of preinstalled browsers is what made most people 'choose' IE. What a joke. IE has NOTHING to offer over firefox or safari, nothing.
I can see IE's dominance in business drop like a rock in the next 2 years, with more and more businesses choosing much more secure mac or open source options over the massive amounts of holes in MS garbage. Business have paid through the arse for non-stop security updates and licensing, and are tired of it.
Even on the consumer side, open source and mac are garning a lot of interest. People are finally waking up, and not accepting garbage anymore.
What choice? it came with windows. Ive only been useing firefox for a year and I'm completly delighted with it. I recently used ie again after my sp2 update and found it to be more annoying than ever. Most people who come to me with browser problems dont know there is anything other than ie, and a lot of the user% will be business users who are not allowed to install anything on the work machines or be fired and just use the browser that came with windows.
Schare attributed Mozilla's spike in popularity to interest by "early adopters," and predicted that in the end IE would retain its majority status.
-
I don't think anybody expects Firefox to gain a majority of the market. The Mozilla foundation is aiming for 10% by the end of 2005. But it doesn't need to to be successful.
Microsoft doesn't make any money off of IE. IE only adds value to Windows if users are forced to use it to access the web. In order for Firefox to be successful, it only needs to gain enough market share to write websites that are not tied to IE. And it can do that with a lot less than 50% of the market.
majority share to be an effective competitor. Just simply
changing the landscape will require only about 10% (just a
guess), but when you toss in the other percentages from the
lesser used browsers, you get something in the 15-20% range
for non-IE users. At that point, web developers will begin to
write code that is less IE specific, especially ActiveX. I disagree
with the poster who says that people "choose" to use IE. While
I'm sure many do, many others use it simply because its on their
desktop. If you were to replace IE's icon with another browser's
icon, that's what they would use. IE offers few advantages, on a
level playing field. Right now, some sites use so much IE
specific code, that in some cases, you have "no choice", but to
use IE. My wife is a perfect example. She never really liked IE,
but had to because nothing else worked as well with ofoto.com
as IE. We tried different browsers, including Navigator, Mozilla,
but she finally settled on Firefox. That's real choice. I would like
to see a side by side comparision of typical end users who have
only used IE, if given the oppprtunity to use Firefox (or maybe
some other browser) for a time. I'm sure many of those would
stick with IE, but I'd say at least half would "choose" to move to
FF.
Schare attributed Mozilla's spike in popularity to interest by "early adopters," and predicted that in the end IE would retain its majority status.
-
I don't think anybody expects Firefox to gain a majority of the market. The Mozilla foundation is aiming for 10% by the end of 2005. But it doesn't need to to be successful.
Microsoft doesn't make any money off of IE. IE only adds value to Windows if users are forced to use it to access the web. In order for Firefox to be successful, it only needs to gain enough market share to write websites that are not tied to IE. And it can do that with a lot less than 50% of the market.
majority share to be an effective competitor. Just simply
changing the landscape will require only about 10% (just a
guess), but when you toss in the other percentages from the
lesser used browsers, you get something in the 15-20% range
for non-IE users. At that point, web developers will begin to
write code that is less IE specific, especially ActiveX. I disagree
with the poster who says that people "choose" to use IE. While
I'm sure many do, many others use it simply because its on their
desktop. If you were to replace IE's icon with another browser's
icon, that's what they would use. IE offers few advantages, on a
level playing field. Right now, some sites use so much IE
specific code, that in some cases, you have "no choice", but to
use IE. My wife is a perfect example. She never really liked IE,
but had to because nothing else worked as well with ofoto.com
as IE. We tried different browsers, including Navigator, Mozilla,
but she finally settled on Firefox. That's real choice. I would like
to see a side by side comparision of typical end users who have
only used IE, if given the oppprtunity to use Firefox (or maybe
some other browser) for a time. I'm sure many of those would
stick with IE, but I'd say at least half would "choose" to move to
FF.
Our (the enlightened ones) job is to let everyone know that there are better options than IE out there, that we use them and are delighted with them. Not passively (that's what IE user do) but actively. Convert your co-workers/friends/customers/vendors. They will thank you for it...
My reasons for not switching are as follows, refute and debate as necessary (but please be civil, that's the best way to get a point across):
Security - I have never experienced any of the apparent glaring security holes the IE seems to have. I have never had my browser hijacked, nor have I ever been the victim of identity theft, nor have I ever been on the receiving end of malicious coding or exploits. While I'm sure the security offered by Firefox is nice, this point is somewhat lost on me.
Popups - I don't know what kind of websites the majority of the internet visits, but my normal rounds don't hit me with any popups. And now that IE has popup blocking built in, even my Google News scouring stays popup-free. The same goes for ActiveX pops. Those just aren't a problem for me.
Speed - When I used Firefox, I didn't perceive it to be any faster than IE. Starting up, shutting down, loading pages, it all seemed the same. Granted, I didn't do any official benchmarking, but I definitely didn't see a difference.
Miscellaneous - For whatever reason, Firefox refused to work with the scroll mechanism on my laptop. Given that I'm a rabid fan of the scroller, I'd sooner give up a finger before I'd give that up.
To be fair, there were things that I loved about Firefox. I enjoyed the skins and the plug-ins feature is nice. The interface is intuitive and clean, while still remembering that I really don't want the "Links" toolbar to appear every time I open a new window. All in all, I do think the browser has potential, but I'm more a fan of results and tangibles than potential.
Our (the enlightened ones) job is to let everyone know that there are better options than IE out there, that we use them and are delighted with them. Not passively (that's what IE user do) but actively. Convert your co-workers/friends/customers/vendors. They will thank you for it...
My reasons for not switching are as follows, refute and debate as necessary (but please be civil, that's the best way to get a point across):
Security - I have never experienced any of the apparent glaring security holes the IE seems to have. I have never had my browser hijacked, nor have I ever been the victim of identity theft, nor have I ever been on the receiving end of malicious coding or exploits. While I'm sure the security offered by Firefox is nice, this point is somewhat lost on me.
Popups - I don't know what kind of websites the majority of the internet visits, but my normal rounds don't hit me with any popups. And now that IE has popup blocking built in, even my Google News scouring stays popup-free. The same goes for ActiveX pops. Those just aren't a problem for me.
Speed - When I used Firefox, I didn't perceive it to be any faster than IE. Starting up, shutting down, loading pages, it all seemed the same. Granted, I didn't do any official benchmarking, but I definitely didn't see a difference.
Miscellaneous - For whatever reason, Firefox refused to work with the scroll mechanism on my laptop. Given that I'm a rabid fan of the scroller, I'd sooner give up a finger before I'd give that up.
To be fair, there were things that I loved about Firefox. I enjoyed the skins and the plug-ins feature is nice. The interface is intuitive and clean, while still remembering that I really don't want the "Links" toolbar to appear every time I open a new window. All in all, I do think the browser has potential, but I'm more a fan of results and tangibles than potential.
Firefox is a breath of fresh air to the otherwise strangled browser market. IE only ever had such control for two reason, One, it was bundled and two, it really was the only real option for the average Joe. Now we have products like Fireofx ( and its mail partner Thunderbird) that are better by far. Microsoft should take this seriously. When Firefox hits the shops it is going to Sky rocket.
Also the comments made by Microsoft regarding company intranets. The company I work for just switched 478 desktops to Firefox. Why? It is far more secure and does everything we always wanted IE to do.
Next step, new OS. Mozilla XP. Has a ring to it.
Firefox is a breath of fresh air to the otherwise strangled browser market. IE only ever had such control for two reason, One, it was bundled and two, it really was the only real option for the average Joe. Now we have products like Fireofx ( and its mail partner Thunderbird) that are better by far. Microsoft should take this seriously. When Firefox hits the shops it is going to Sky rocket.
Also the comments made by Microsoft regarding company intranets. The company I work for just switched 478 desktops to Firefox. Why? It is far more secure and does everything we always wanted IE to do.
Next step, new OS. Mozilla XP. Has a ring to it.
IT departments or other areas of technology, and that many of
these early adopters are spreading the message inside their
respective corporations that Firefox is an excellent
alternative. Corporations may be slow to change, but that
change WILL come and once they make the move there will be
no turning back. When this happens (and it's not far off)
Microsloth will still make up some excuse why it doesn't matter.
While they they sit on their laurels and make excuses all day, the
open-source community is hard at work.
IT departments or other areas of technology, and that many of
these early adopters are spreading the message inside their
respective corporations that Firefox is an excellent
alternative. Corporations may be slow to change, but that
change WILL come and once they make the move there will be
no turning back. When this happens (and it's not far off)
Microsloth will still make up some excuse why it doesn't matter.
While they they sit on their laurels and make excuses all day, the
open-source community is hard at work.
So 5 million people downloaded it, so the computer guy in the company says its better, so you hate Microsoft, there is no revolution, people just don't care as much as the computer geek locked in his cubicle working past 5pm trying to get "the code" done.
I say unplug, go outside, take a deep breathe and relax a bit. 5 million downloads is not going worry Microsoft, 5 million downloads does have them hitting the panic button....
----
The computer guy at lots of companies is also the one that is telling the management what is an acceptable way to reduce their risks and headaches.
If the computer guy at the company decides that Firefox is "cheaper" to manage form the stand point of what it costs to support the computers for the company then it doesn't take much to change what the company browser is.
If the computer management is done thru centralized software distribution such as Active Directory then the change can happen very rapidly.
Like everything else this will come down to cost. If it is cheaper to cleanup after IE downloads lots of adware and other crap and it is not a problem to the company to be insecure then they won't change.
When the computer guy tells his boss that just changing what browser that is used on all the company machines can save him x dollars in support costs, time, adware blocking softwre, and other tools then it changes easily and rapidly.
So 5 million people downloaded it, so the computer guy in the company says its better, so you hate Microsoft, there is no revolution, people just don't care as much as the computer geek locked in his cubicle working past 5pm trying to get "the code" done.
I say unplug, go outside, take a deep breathe and relax a bit. 5 million downloads is not going worry Microsoft, 5 million downloads does have them hitting the panic button....
----
The computer guy at lots of companies is also the one that is telling the management what is an acceptable way to reduce their risks and headaches.
If the computer guy at the company decides that Firefox is "cheaper" to manage form the stand point of what it costs to support the computers for the company then it doesn't take much to change what the company browser is.
If the computer management is done thru centralized software distribution such as Active Directory then the change can happen very rapidly.
Like everything else this will come down to cost. If it is cheaper to cleanup after IE downloads lots of adware and other crap and it is not a problem to the company to be insecure then they won't change.
When the computer guy tells his boss that just changing what browser that is used on all the company machines can save him x dollars in support costs, time, adware blocking softwre, and other tools then it changes easily and rapidly.
The denial of these MS managers is quite funny but I guess they will say anything to keep their jobs. I loved the "all the factors that led them to choose IE in the first place" comment. There has been only one factor "no other choice".
I think that MS has lost its most valuable asset, that is its reputation for quality and it isn't going to be easy to get it back.
I wonder what they will say when their share drops again next month. Its going to be real hard to put this "Firefox" out.
While I do find it amusing that the MS execs are in a bit of denial, understand that they do still have more than the lion's share of the browser market. People say "only" when referring to their 89% or so and I think that's a little odd. Most companies would kill to have 89% of a market.
Give it time. Microsoft will react, but only when they determine it would be prudent to do so. Nipping Firefox in the bud would limit their ability to see what people like about it, then assimilate it into their own browser, so I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft let Mozilla simmer for a bit.
Love them or hate them, Microsoft is very good at making strategic, forward-thinking decisions. I don't expect them to make any moves until their share drops below 70%, though. Right now, it's just a sleeping giant.
- It doesn't hurt, its only a flesh wound
-
by
November 23, 2004 11:19 AM PST
- Its pretty impressive that Firefox was downloaded 5 million times in the first week or so. I bet MS wished that its Halo game moved that fast.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
- I've had worse!
-
by Christopher Hall
November 30, 2004 6:27 AM PST
- For the record, Halo moved pretty quick for being $50 a pop. If it were free, I'm sure it would be in every Xbox worldwide right now.
-
-
- most valuable asset
-
by Ubber geek
June 6, 2007 9:45 AM PDT
- http://www.analogstereo.com/audi_allroad_quattro_owners_manual.htm
-
-
See all 90 Comments >>The denial of these MS managers is quite funny but I guess they will say anything to keep their jobs. I loved the "all the factors that led them to choose IE in the first place" comment. There has been only one factor "no other choice".
I think that MS has lost its most valuable asset, that is its reputation for quality and it isn't going to be easy to get it back.
I wonder what they will say when their share drops again next month. Its going to be real hard to put this "Firefox" out.
While I do find it amusing that the MS execs are in a bit of denial, understand that they do still have more than the lion's share of the browser market. People say "only" when referring to their 89% or so and I think that's a little odd. Most companies would kill to have 89% of a market.
Give it time. Microsoft will react, but only when they determine it would be prudent to do so. Nipping Firefox in the bud would limit their ability to see what people like about it, then assimilate it into their own browser, so I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft let Mozilla simmer for a bit.
Love them or hate them, Microsoft is very good at making strategic, forward-thinking decisions. I don't expect them to make any moves until their share drops below 70%, though. Right now, it's just a sleeping giant.