TechRepublic : A ZDNet Tech Community

Report as spam Discussion  -  Post 128 of 528
I don't think it's ridiculous
Essentially, she's being accused by someone of being a sexual predator towards minors. There is a local case where an adult male exposed himself to a woman and her children, and now he has to register as a sex offender.

So, someone who doesn't have the guts to post using their name accuses her of this. What if she's a school teacher or had some other job with a morals clause and they decide that she'll be "laid off"?

Also, lots of companies are doing web searches before they hire a candidate. So they search her name and find that she allegedly exposed herself to some children. She's just lost her chance at that job.

That's called defamation of character.
Posted: 06/29/2009 @ 07:47 AM (PDT)
avatar
GSG     2
Job Role: Other IS/IT or Technology Function
Location: SPRINGFIELD, Missouri
Member since: 05/25/2000

View Profile  | Send Message

Print/View all Posts | Subscribe to this Thread 

Read original item: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealed
Aliascsmith.kaze | 06/29/2009 @ 06:00 AM (PDT)
Stupid womandouglasgross@... | 07/03/2009 @ 03:41 AM (PDT)
AttitudeSamuelTime | 07/03/2009 @ 04:22 AM (PDT)
Not so much...PsiFiScout | 07/03/2009 @ 07:34 AM (PDT)
Financial Loss?cdyer@... | 07/03/2009 @ 07:58 AM (PDT)
Not a problem...PsiFiScout | 07/03/2009 @ 08:25 AM (PDT)
Solution-Accept, review, possibly act - but don't postSteve Romero | 07/03/2009 @ 10:44 AM (PDT)
Hmmmm Real Minefield herejcodrington@... | 07/03/2009 @ 05:01 PM (PDT)
when scum make false accusations like this, they deserve toDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 09:47 AM (PDT)
Interesting...Willy MacWindows | 07/04/2009 @ 06:39 PM (PDT)
Just how do you know that she didn't try that approch 1st?mjolnar@... | 07/07/2009 @ 08:59 AM (PDT)
Using Google in place of Real Background Check = Bad Ideasmiller987 | 07/03/2009 @ 07:53 PM (PDT)
I LIKE IT!Yowye | 07/09/2009 @ 08:34 AM (PDT)
Re: Attitudebpate@... | 07/03/2009 @ 07:40 AM (PDT)
Obama's Attitudelmac1947@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:17 AM (PDT)
What?theguru1995@... | 07/03/2009 @ 10:29 AM (PDT)
Since when did Obama become "The Extreme Left"?Beoweolf | 07/03/2009 @ 10:38 AM (PDT)
Appalled?lmac1947@... | 07/05/2009 @ 08:01 AM (PDT)
Selling weapons...JCitizen | 07/05/2009 @ 11:57 AM (PDT)
Regarding the nature of the votePsiFiScout | 07/11/2009 @ 10:24 AM (PDT)
That dog won't hunt, PsiFiScoutNickNielsen | 07/11/2009 @ 11:48 AM (PDT)
Whew! When Did This Forum Become A Political Venue?griff.computerservices@... | 07/12/2009 @ 06:14 AM (PDT)
The answer to your question, Griff, is "Yes"NickNielsen | 07/12/2009 @ 11:21 AM (PDT)
Left-Wing, NO Twirp, Centre Factionalfielee@... | 07/05/2009 @ 08:43 PM (PDT)
alfielee,,, Your buddy BO won't be around whenSilverBullet | 07/06/2009 @ 10:33 AM (PDT)
Neither, SilverBullet, will your buddy Dubbya.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:37 PM (PDT)
But YOU are extreme left wingRipVan | 07/08/2009 @ 04:16 AM (PDT)
Left wing?adakar_sg@... | 07/10/2009 @ 01:45 AM (PDT)
Is that ignorance or idiocy? I'm not sure whichNickNielsen | 07/10/2009 @ 06:00 AM (PDT)
Responsibility???PsiFiScout | 07/11/2009 @ 10:30 AM (PDT)
This is not the place for political discussionsMikeG3b | 07/06/2009 @ 07:50 AM (PDT)
other lossesBeilstwh | 07/06/2009 @ 10:31 AM (PDT)
No attacks on the Constitution...?RipVan | 07/09/2009 @ 03:49 AM (PDT)
No attacks on the BORPsiFiScout | 07/11/2009 @ 10:41 AM (PDT)
@PsiFiScout...JCitizen | 07/21/2009 @ 09:24 PM (PDT)
re: Obama's Attitude Thomw@... | 07/06/2009 @ 10:31 AM (PDT)
Proof required.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:35 PM (PDT)
The Answers are in the postPsiFiScout | 01/13/2010 @ 05:57 AM (PST)
Mispost NickNielsen | 07/11/2009 @ 11:45 AM (PDT)
Adiffpsmith@... | 07/03/2009 @ 01:37 PM (PDT)
America Bless You!Draygonia@... | 01/12/2010 @ 10:28 AM (PST)
Hahaha!Kostaghus | 07/03/2009 @ 09:23 AM (PDT)
Right On!vucliriel@... | 07/03/2009 @ 11:30 AM (PDT)
You seem to not understand.deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 09:40 PM (PDT)
Kostaghus, a Narcissist!alfielee@... | 07/05/2009 @ 08:36 PM (PDT)
wow, do you have one of those new recyclable paperbags?Deadly Ernest | 07/05/2009 @ 09:48 PM (PDT)
There is a distinction between private lies and public libel or slander.deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 09:38 PM (PDT)
so when someone says lies that are believed and the policeDeadly Ernest | 07/05/2009 @ 09:47 PM (PDT)
So, if someone puts out a false report about youralaniane@... | 07/06/2009 @ 09:40 AM (PDT)
Adiffpsmith@... | 07/03/2009 @ 01:29 PM (PDT)
she wasBeilstwh | 07/06/2009 @ 10:25 AM (PDT)
it was not a micro mini or a mini - there are links in the threadDeadly Ernest | 07/06/2009 @ 10:36 AM (PDT)
Of what relevance to the matter of libel?deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 07:59 PM (PDT)
Trollsjimdrvr99@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:28 AM (PDT)
"hate" ?The Truth | 07/03/2009 @ 06:18 AM (PDT)
Agreeing to disagree on meritBeltwayTech | 07/03/2009 @ 08:38 AM (PDT)
I Need Photographic Evidencelewinskys | 07/03/2009 @ 05:11 AM (PDT)
Subscribe that.brisky@... | 07/03/2009 @ 06:56 AM (PDT)
I agreetrhodes@... | 07/22/2009 @ 12:58 PM (PDT)
There are links in the thread to photos, the skirt was mid thigh -ntDeadly Ernest | 07/22/2009 @ 02:06 PM (PDT)
Further down are links to a TV website with a photo in itDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 07:37 AM (PDT)
Trollish mansubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 06:17 AM (PDT)
"troll"...The Truth | 07/03/2009 @ 06:20 AM (PDT)
Do not feed the trollssubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 07:54 AM (PDT)
Kind of like TV, eh?mscougargirl | 07/03/2009 @ 06:46 AM (PDT)
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?subpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 08:02 AM (PDT)
So wrong - it frightning....Beoweolf | 07/03/2009 @ 10:20 AM (PDT)
I somewhat agree but....keyboards@... | 07/03/2009 @ 06:31 AM (PDT)
try finding some facts before commenting - there's a photoDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 07:42 AM (PDT)
No EvidenceDaemonSlayer | 07/03/2009 @ 03:40 PM (PDT)
I do suggest you go and read the rest of the posts and linksDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 09:32 PM (PDT)
Now the frat rags have hashed the story...JCitizen | 07/04/2009 @ 02:11 PM (PDT)
Pix are gone, btw, also the video posted on 2nd siteBecca Alice | 07/06/2009 @ 07:35 AM (PDT)
I disagree the issue is about slander, it's about dress code!vucliriel@... | 07/07/2009 @ 07:36 PM (PDT)
Motivation irrelevant to merits of the suit.deepsand | 07/07/2009 @ 08:53 PM (PDT)
Vucliriel, you couldn't be morer wrong - if that was the caseDeadly Ernest | 07/08/2009 @ 01:11 AM (PDT)
I give up...vucliriel@... | 07/08/2009 @ 09:38 AM (PDT)
I'm glad you're giving up on trying to change the issue to oneDeadly Ernest | 07/09/2009 @ 09:20 AM (PDT)
so you support anonymous slander - please confirm that soDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 07:38 AM (PDT)
The title of your post is REDUNDANT!!!Fletcher11 | 07/03/2009 @ 09:06 AM (PDT)
Nothing to do with her sensitivityinet32@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:04 PM (PDT)
Think, you idiot!alfielee@... | 07/05/2009 @ 08:17 PM (PDT)
and a useless 'tool' at thatDeadly Ernest | 07/05/2009 @ 09:50 PM (PDT)
Stupid Student.deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 09:46 PM (PDT)
Not stupid or frivolous.Timbo Zimbabwe | 07/06/2009 @ 05:39 AM (PDT)
agree with judgesjoseph.r.piazza@... | 07/06/2009 @ 08:26 AM (PDT)
If you make a comment you should have the courage to put your name to it.nick@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:57 AM (PDT)
Short skirt and no underwear? mhhmmm visuals! thksPhotogenic Memory | 07/03/2009 @ 05:25 AM (PDT)
Trackingsubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 06:24 AM (PDT)
No Thanksjamjube | 07/03/2009 @ 05:52 AM (PDT)
Contact me: I will replynick@... | 07/03/2009 @ 08:42 PM (PDT)
Amen! Away with anonymityBrownshoe Sailor | 07/03/2009 @ 06:16 AM (PDT)
only your opinion...The Truth | 07/03/2009 @ 06:22 AM (PDT)
Opinions go on the Editorial PagesmithDms2002@... | 07/03/2009 @ 06:28 AM (PDT)
There oughtta be a law???PsiFiScout | 07/03/2009 @ 07:41 AM (PDT)
Stop Hiding - Come Out - Give Your Real Name - Show Your Real FaceAnita Y. Mathis | 07/03/2009 @ 08:59 AM (PDT)
So, the Witness protection service is wrong?Beoweolf | 07/03/2009 @ 10:59 AM (PDT)
Witness protection applies AFTER they publicly appeared inDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:39 AM (PDT)
This is a lot more than vanity - it a false accussation of a majorDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:40 AM (PDT)
Wear a KiltHapGail_HomeInMd@... | 07/03/2009 @ 05:59 AM (PDT)
Woman sues..michael.burgess@... | 07/03/2009 @ 08:47 AM (PDT)
No we don't!RipVan | 07/08/2009 @ 04:48 AM (PDT)
re: No we don'tmichael.burgess@... | 07/09/2009 @ 06:08 AM (PDT)
RE: Aliasjohnriley@... | 07/03/2009 @ 10:55 AM (PDT)
An article that discusses the suit.Karin Sue | 07/03/2009 @ 05:33 PM (PDT)
Thank You...vucliriel@... | 07/04/2009 @ 09:59 AM (PDT)
Free speechfreaknout | 07/06/2009 @ 06:42 AM (PDT)
Free speech vs protected free speech.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:01 PM (PDT)
That someone posted a slanderous commenttnt60 | 07/07/2009 @ 07:34 AM (PDT)
the paper didn't use the comment in their actual reportDeadly Ernest | 07/07/2009 @ 08:03 AM (PDT)
Litigious perverted sadistTheOnlyRick | 07/09/2009 @ 02:02 AM (PDT)
Except for the fact all the evidence shows you just lied aboutDeadly Ernest | 07/09/2009 @ 09:23 AM (PDT)
I Hate to strike your buffer Zone...Yowye | 07/09/2009 @ 08:44 AM (PDT)
REVISED - 'offensive' or 'inflammatory' or 'inappropriate'...MUnruh23 | 07/16/2009 @ 11:06 AM (PDT)
The main issue...vucliriel@... | 07/17/2009 @ 07:17 AM (PDT)
The main issue is if someone can lie about someone is allowable as anDeadly Ernest | 07/17/2009 @ 08:18 AM (PDT)
If you read the original blog postNickNielsen | 07/17/2009 @ 04:56 PM (PDT)
yes indeed, 'claimed'vucliriel@... | 07/18/2009 @ 11:13 AM (PDT)
Not narrow-minded at allNickNielsen | 07/18/2009 @ 11:32 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedcogsofwar | 06/29/2009 @ 06:20 AM (PDT)
AttitudeSamuelTime | 07/03/2009 @ 04:12 AM (PDT)
ReactionsPaul W. Homer | 07/03/2009 @ 07:38 AM (PDT)
Taking life a little less seriously...link470 | 07/03/2009 @ 08:04 AM (PDT)
No, but fewer webmasters wil be allowing...JCitizen | 07/07/2009 @ 11:42 PM (PDT)
Except the newspaper website has a registration processDeadly Ernest | 07/09/2009 @ 09:26 AM (PDT)
First: the Indignity suffered v. Irony of an indecent dress - not the same!Beoweolf | 07/03/2009 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
Ridiculoustmalo627@... | 06/29/2009 @ 06:48 AM (PDT)
I don't think it's ridiculousGSG | 06/29/2009 @ 07:47 AM (PDT)
Movie star mousetraps?Dr Dij | 06/29/2009 @ 04:32 PM (PDT)
Your making a lot of assumptions...ctrtjm | 06/30/2009 @ 02:21 AM (PDT)
You're assuming you understoodj_eyon@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:33 AM (PDT)
re: You are making a lot of assumptions...owner@... | 06/30/2009 @ 10:01 AM (PDT)
And who decides it's responsiblepueblonative | 07/03/2009 @ 04:23 AM (PDT)
Rhetorical questionssubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 06:39 AM (PDT)
assumptions vs factsparkbench@... | 07/03/2009 @ 08:39 AM (PDT)
Yep, and the article that started this discussion is the postsDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 09:29 AM (PDT)
That explains it...vucliriel@... | 07/03/2009 @ 12:25 PM (PDT)
miss prospective lawyerDaemonSlayer | 07/03/2009 @ 03:53 PM (PDT)
it's a lot more than that - it's an accusation of a sex crimeDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:42 AM (PDT)
The law also provides protection izzy_again | 07/06/2009 @ 12:22 PM (PDT)
How is it possible that she should "thrust herself into the limelight"deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:03 PM (PDT)
get some sense, buy a brain, and read the full storyDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:41 AM (PDT)
Okay; now, what's your excuse? [eom]deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:06 PM (PDT)
BTW, Let's NOT confuse issues!vucliriel@... | 07/03/2009 @ 12:46 PM (PDT)
Speaking of...DaemonSlayer | 07/03/2009 @ 04:02 PM (PDT)
I strongly suggest you read what the court case is aboutDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:44 AM (PDT)
Rightsizzy_again | 07/06/2009 @ 01:26 PM (PDT)
Dear clueless,deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:08 PM (PDT)
How's this for an idea - you give me your real name andDeadly Ernest | 07/07/2009 @ 06:18 AM (PDT)
Indeed, Christophe, your full name please.deepsand | 07/07/2009 @ 09:02 PM (PDT)
Silly - she's not charged with a crimepaul.doherty@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:18 AM (PDT)
Read a bookj_eyon@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:38 AM (PDT)
re: Silly - she's not charged with a crime owner@... | 06/30/2009 @ 10:05 AM (PDT)
RE: Silly - she's not charged with a crimeraoullux | 07/03/2009 @ 02:08 AM (PDT)
Sue the hell out of the bugger as that sort of mud has glue in itDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 03:24 AM (PDT)
Have to agreeanthony.murphy@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:04 AM (PDT)
Yeah, they accept responsibilitypueblonative | 07/03/2009 @ 05:22 AM (PDT)
I agree with YOU, but NOT with the person on this case!...vucliriel@... | 07/03/2009 @ 12:56 PM (PDT)
You're wrong, she did NOT attack the freedom of the pressDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 05:30 AM (PDT)
@DeadlyEarnestvucliriel@... | 07/04/2009 @ 09:45 AM (PDT)
I see two totally different issues here - with a third being addedDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 10:30 AM (PDT)
Comment about clothing standards - malls are not a privateDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 10:39 AM (PDT)
About the real issue hereNickNielsen | 07/04/2009 @ 11:39 AM (PDT)
Nick, I'll assume the US laws are as you state, but do they notDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 11:51 AM (PDT)
Yes..JCitizen | 07/04/2009 @ 12:37 PM (PDT)
A post about this whole thingNickNielsen | 07/04/2009 @ 01:41 PM (PDT)
Uhmm, Nick - does anyone REALLY understand US law?Deadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 02:04 PM (PDT)
Oh Really?SamuelTime | 07/03/2009 @ 04:16 AM (PDT)
Dear Silly,deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:26 PM (PDT)
ONE BIG Question to be answeredDaemonSlayer | 06/30/2009 @ 01:13 PM (PDT)
the reason people don't reveal their identityi.t@... | 07/01/2009 @ 01:36 AM (PDT)
The difference beingJessie | 07/01/2009 @ 10:45 AM (PDT)
Untrue accusation = defamation of characterpemmerson | 07/03/2009 @ 06:19 AM (PDT)
Not Necessarily.DaemonSlayer | 07/03/2009 @ 04:20 PM (PDT)
try considering she didn't think it important enough to spendDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 05:34 AM (PDT)
Aren't you condoning defamation here?vucliriel@... | 07/04/2009 @ 10:07 AM (PDT)
No - defamation and slander is where you state an untruthDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 10:49 AM (PDT)
exactly, at that's what all this is aboutDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:45 AM (PDT)
Yes and No ...Baron von Headloq | 07/03/2009 @ 03:09 AM (PDT)
We come to a balance in between - two such balances areDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 03:28 AM (PDT)
Cost of moderationsubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 06:53 AM (PDT)
very true, the real problem here is, IMHO, the attitude of theDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 07:46 AM (PDT)
Agreed...vucliriel@... | 07/03/2009 @ 01:25 PM (PDT)
Shoot! - Who knows?..JCitizen | 07/03/2009 @ 01:36 PM (PDT)
vucliriel - you seem to be missing the point hereDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 05:39 AM (PDT)
You are right...vucliriel@... | 07/04/2009 @ 10:14 AM (PDT)
good point V..izzy_again | 07/07/2009 @ 11:46 AM (PDT)
Maybe not ridiculous, but certainly outrageous.jimnjulia@... | 07/03/2009 @ 03:53 AM (PDT)
Not so outrageouspemmerson | 07/03/2009 @ 06:42 AM (PDT)
Take a rough guesssubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 07:06 AM (PDT)
Whistle-blower acts do not apply here!MikeG3b | 07/06/2009 @ 06:52 AM (PDT)
WrongDraygonia@... | 01/12/2010 @ 10:27 AM (PST)
Correct they have freedom of speech, but NOTDeadly Ernest | 01/12/2010 @ 12:16 PM (PST)
A grey areaPsiFiScout | 01/13/2010 @ 06:10 AM (PST)
The Privacy Act doesn't apply in this caseNickNielsen | 01/13/2010 @ 10:35 AM (PST)
privacy legislation not applicable to people making publicDeadly Ernest | 01/13/2010 @ 12:15 PM (PST)
Something to think about...Yowye | 01/13/2010 @ 07:52 AM (PST)
Not so ridiculousTai Chi Bear | 06/29/2009 @ 08:26 AM (PDT)
A little different....tmalo627@... | 06/29/2009 @ 09:50 AM (PDT)
Well, I beg to differ a littleTai Chi Bear | 06/29/2009 @ 12:27 PM (PDT)
Pretty pleasesanteewelding | 06/29/2009 @ 12:45 PM (PDT)
Need proof of people believing "official" stuff?james.wood@... | 06/30/2009 @ 07:45 AM (PDT)
Yeah, and I'm SO glad we got rid of him in January!Zeppo9191 | 06/30/2009 @ 08:53 AM (PDT)
Not just elected him but re-elected himilargo | 07/02/2009 @ 05:03 AM (PDT)
ProofJosiahB | 07/03/2009 @ 03:26 AM (PDT)
Yes, but...vucliriel@... | 07/03/2009 @ 01:34 PM (PDT)
The newspaper did NOT research and print an articleDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:46 AM (PDT)
A little different....owner@... | 06/30/2009 @ 10:12 AM (PDT)
That's whytmalo627@... | 06/30/2009 @ 02:15 PM (PDT)
Newspapers have done this for years!ITSuper | 06/29/2009 @ 12:18 PM (PDT)
I guess my point is...tmalo627@... | 06/29/2009 @ 01:59 PM (PDT)
there is a difference between an unofficial Internet forumDeadly Ernest | 06/29/2009 @ 03:22 PM (PDT)
Slander laws are very cleargardoglee | 06/30/2009 @ 07:32 AM (PDT)
Correct, and to me the real problem here is the newspaper isDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 07:42 AM (PDT)
Here is my other thought...tmalo627@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:06 AM (PDT)
tmalo627 - I don't know the exact wording of the law there, butDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 08:21 AM (PDT)
Goes back to the original statementtmalo627@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:59 AM (PDT)
The difference is the anonymouse poster made a clear andDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 09:54 AM (PDT)
Which Laws?ncudmore@... | 06/30/2009 @ 01:09 PM (PDT)
Why did you put that in quotes?TonytheTiger | 07/01/2009 @ 07:49 PM (PDT)
Does anyone have a link to the comment?melias@... | 06/30/2009 @ 10:13 AM (PDT)
this post has a link to one story on itDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 10:35 AM (PDT)
Thanks for the Linksmelias@... | 06/30/2009 @ 11:00 AM (PDT)
From The Register articlesubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 07:49 AM (PDT)
Subpixel, yes those quotes are from the original newspaperDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 09:33 AM (PDT)
Photo from Foxsubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 01:29 PM (PDT)
re: I guess my point is...owner@... | 06/30/2009 @ 10:22 AM (PDT)
Public Figures are less protectedsupport@... | 07/02/2009 @ 06:59 AM (PDT)
Accountability is a two way street.PsiFiScout | 06/30/2009 @ 08:55 AM (PDT)
Or it may mean she wishes to comply with the local laws ofDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 09:55 AM (PDT)
Serving papers does not require public display of the recipient.PsiFiScout | 07/01/2009 @ 07:59 AM (PDT)
it deos require the recipient's name and it appears the paperDeadly Ernest | 07/01/2009 @ 10:06 AM (PDT)
Subpeona does not require name in Kentuckylarrywest@... | 07/03/2009 @ 06:10 PM (PDT)
John Does get sued all the time...TonytheTiger | 07/02/2009 @ 11:18 AM (PDT)
I don't know what your neck of the woods is likeDeadly Ernest | 07/02/2009 @ 12:11 PM (PDT)
Ever heard the old English tale of the sturgeon?...JCitizen | 07/03/2009 @ 01:52 PM (PDT)
in today's world, keeping quiet after being accussed of a sexDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 05:44 AM (PDT)
Maybe..JCitizen | 07/04/2009 @ 12:00 PM (PDT)
JCitizen, there's a number of news articles on this and it wouldDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 12:13 PM (PDT)
Yes, I am compelled to agree..JCitizen | 07/04/2009 @ 01:18 PM (PDT)
they may have done it for yearslibrary assistant | 07/03/2009 @ 02:51 AM (PDT)
I agreeAyreWolf | 07/03/2009 @ 06:22 AM (PDT)
Disagreealex.kashko@... | 07/03/2009 @ 07:27 AM (PDT)
Not such a stretchOz_Media | 06/29/2009 @ 03:35 PM (PDT)
aren't there a couple of high school kids in the US doing a year Deadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 07:52 AM (PDT)
I remember it vaguelyOz_Media | 06/30/2009 @ 10:51 AM (PDT)
Cowardlyrobertmro | 06/30/2009 @ 07:46 AM (PDT)
I sometimes participate in on-line news forums down hereDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 08:25 AM (PDT)
HUH?Oz_Media | 06/30/2009 @ 10:57 AM (PDT)
Yes, you use an aliasJessie | 07/01/2009 @ 10:58 AM (PDT)
Most newspapers require membershipjdclyde | 07/01/2009 @ 08:34 PM (PDT)
Okay, so I sign up as Jose Cuervopueblonative | 07/03/2009 @ 05:33 AM (PDT)
Most such forums require you to receive and respond toDeadly Ernest | 07/03/2009 @ 07:50 AM (PDT)
Kind of goes againstjdclyde | 07/01/2009 @ 08:35 PM (PDT)
Further compoundedsanteewelding | 07/01/2009 @ 08:41 PM (PDT)
Really?smiller987 | 07/03/2009 @ 08:02 PM (PDT)
In an open society, yes, the names should be made public Deadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:48 AM (PDT)
Please Explainsmiller987 | 07/04/2009 @ 12:45 PM (PDT)
there is no naturally applied freedom of speech, what we haveDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 01:51 PM (PDT)
What people believe and understand re. the 'net is irrelevant.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:30 PM (PDT)
RE: RidiculousITCompGuy | 06/30/2009 @ 08:08 AM (PDT)
Anonymous crimessubpixel | 07/03/2009 @ 08:38 AM (PDT)
Who is going to decide what is dispariging...JCitizen | 07/05/2009 @ 12:44 PM (PDT)
re: rediculousowner@... | 06/30/2009 @ 09:53 AM (PDT)
Learn to wear a KiltHapGail_HomeInMd@... | 07/03/2009 @ 05:58 AM (PDT)
What May Be Slander Doesn't Qualify As Free SpeechRichard-HK | 07/03/2009 @ 07:40 AM (PDT)
The Reporter's Shield Law should not apply hereDeadly Ernest | 06/29/2009 @ 08:01 AM (PDT)
It hasn't, in similar cases. (eom)seanferd | 06/29/2009 @ 02:03 PM (PDT)
doesn't mean it shouldn'tDeadly Ernest | 06/29/2009 @ 03:11 PM (PDT)
Agreed!seanferd | 07/03/2009 @ 03:53 PM (PDT)
Are judges sane anywhere?larrywest@... | 07/03/2009 @ 06:37 PM (PDT)
Go back in history and all judges were just powerful localsDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 07:52 AM (PDT)
The Technology partsanteewelding | 06/29/2009 @ 08:27 AM (PDT)
just because you have freedom of speech jdclyde | 06/29/2009 @ 01:24 PM (PDT)
Much like the yelling 'Fire' argumentNotSoChiGuy | 06/29/2009 @ 01:50 PM (PDT)
The double standardjdclyde | 06/29/2009 @ 02:33 PM (PDT)
Just a minute JD, there's not been anythign said that she didDeadly Ernest | 06/29/2009 @ 03:13 PM (PDT)
That was the whole pointjdclyde | 06/29/2009 @ 03:21 PM (PDT)
That's not how it came across in your original post - if theDeadly Ernest | 06/29/2009 @ 03:24 PM (PDT)
Well...AttackComputerWhiz | 06/30/2009 @ 11:25 AM (PDT)
There are some posts with links to the articles and a photoDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 11:39 AM (PDT)
The real questionjdclyde | 07/01/2009 @ 08:37 PM (PDT)
The original post was a little misleadingNotSoChiGuy | 06/30/2009 @ 09:19 AM (PDT)
re: On MovieTome: Megan Fox undresses for TRANSFORMERS! BNET Business Netowner@... | 06/30/2009 @ 10:34 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedzentross | 06/30/2009 @ 07:23 AM (PDT)
Most newspapers will not print anonymous "to the editor" postsMikeG3b | 06/30/2009 @ 07:46 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealededdieholman | 06/30/2009 @ 08:01 AM (PDT)
Yes, her name was mentioned.melias@... | 06/30/2009 @ 11:13 AM (PDT)
Ok... NEXT Question.DaemonSlayer | 06/30/2009 @ 04:17 PM (PDT)
Her name was in the original article - a comment on thatDeadly Ernest | 07/01/2009 @ 01:17 PM (PDT)
Short answer: yes.Mabrick | 06/30/2009 @ 08:02 AM (PDT)
Suppressing posts about a murder... helps who?westsan@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:04 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedhimmelsmi@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:16 AM (PDT)
Shocking.......michaelsaltmarsh@... | 06/30/2009 @ 08:37 AM (PDT)
No constitution right to slander or libel.deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 03:18 PM (PDT)
Statements made out of ignorancejdclyde | 07/05/2009 @ 04:47 PM (PDT)
It's annoyed the hell out of me since I was just a kid.deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 06:35 PM (PDT)
No problem. :Pmichaelsaltmarsh@... | 07/06/2009 @ 09:16 AM (PDT)
Actually, this case strikes me more as not money asDeadly Ernest | 07/06/2009 @ 10:47 AM (PDT)
very interesting...michaelsaltmarsh@... | 07/06/2009 @ 12:39 PM (PDT)
The deciding issue here is the crime she's accused ofDeadly Ernest | 07/06/2009 @ 12:48 PM (PDT)
yikes..... ok never mind.....michaelsaltmarsh@... | 07/07/2009 @ 07:58 AM (PDT)
It can be a bit confusing, especially now some of the sourceDeadly Ernest | 07/07/2009 @ 08:15 AM (PDT)
Fortunately for her, your opinion doesn't carry any weight.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:22 PM (PDT)
You are quite the happy person aren't youmichaelsaltmarsh@... | 07/07/2009 @ 08:07 AM (PDT)
You mistake method for manner.deepsand | 07/07/2009 @ 09:10 PM (PDT)
Fair enough.michaelsaltmarsh@... | 07/08/2009 @ 09:05 AM (PDT)
She probably just wants attentionarignote | 06/30/2009 @ 08:41 AM (PDT)
This is why I stay away from e-spats...NotSoChiGuy | 06/30/2009 @ 08:54 AM (PDT)
here's a link to the original article in the Richmond RegisterDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 10:40 AM (PDT)
Thanks for posting that (nt)NotSoChiGuy | 06/30/2009 @ 11:00 AM (PDT)
Too short for shoppingAttackComputerWhiz | 06/30/2009 @ 11:31 AM (PDT)
To what degree? 90%? 65% What's the acceptable lower bound?deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 03:24 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedowner@... | 06/30/2009 @ 09:36 AM (PDT)
You're all missing the pointTripOne | 06/30/2009 @ 11:11 AM (PDT)
Try reading Toni Bowers againj_eyon@... | 07/01/2009 @ 08:50 AM (PDT)
re: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealed ain't goodGis Bun | 06/30/2009 @ 11:19 AM (PDT)
She revealed her own name...AttackComputerWhiz | 06/30/2009 @ 11:41 AM (PDT)
In most legal jurisdictions Malls a re classed as semi-publicDeadly Ernest | 06/30/2009 @ 12:04 PM (PDT)
THAT is the issue...vucliriel@... | 07/04/2009 @ 10:49 AM (PDT)
Add into that the right of the mall to be two faced in how theyDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 10:55 AM (PDT)
Thanks for your heroic efforts DE..JCitizen | 07/07/2009 @ 11:58 PM (PDT)
Still clueless.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:34 PM (PDT)
Read Toni Bowers article againj_eyon@... | 07/01/2009 @ 08:53 AM (PDT)
Facts not in evidencesanteewelding | 07/01/2009 @ 08:02 PM (PDT)
And that's the exact reason - the person make a false claimDeadly Ernest | 07/01/2009 @ 01:20 PM (PDT)
My final thoughts on thismelias@... | 06/30/2009 @ 11:27 AM (PDT)
I'm afraidTonytheTiger | 07/01/2009 @ 12:35 PM (PDT)
yet most libel and slander laws require the claimant to proveDeadly Ernest | 07/01/2009 @ 01:22 PM (PDT)
Of course.TonytheTiger | 07/01/2009 @ 07:36 PM (PDT)
A copy of the post is the proof the slanderous statementDeadly Ernest | 07/02/2009 @ 12:31 AM (PDT)
Nope.TonytheTiger | 07/02/2009 @ 08:24 AM (PDT)
You must have some odd laws in Ohio - I checked the text bookDeadly Ernest | 07/02/2009 @ 08:47 AM (PDT)
IN the US...JCitizen | 07/04/2009 @ 01:07 PM (PDT)
slander is one of the more simple tort lawsDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 01:58 PM (PDT)
Sounds about right DE...(edited)JCitizen | 07/04/2009 @ 02:29 PM (PDT)
Not so, ErnestNickNielsen | 07/04/2009 @ 02:45 PM (PDT)
Nick, I admit I simplified it, but all that comes under the bitDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 03:29 PM (PDT)
Truth of defamatory statement is an affirmative defense ...deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 09:53 PM (PDT)
PrecedentTBone2k | 06/30/2009 @ 11:36 AM (PDT)
Catching upj_eyon@... | 07/01/2009 @ 11:45 AM (PDT)
Maybe they should because their stated method of operationDeadly Ernest | 07/01/2009 @ 01:24 PM (PDT)
Doesn't thisDerek Schauland | 06/30/2009 @ 07:28 PM (PDT)
Way off base -- but kudos for realizing itj_eyon@... | 07/01/2009 @ 11:41 AM (PDT)
Disclaimers.. There's much more to it than you may think!vucliriel@... | 07/09/2009 @ 08:12 PM (PDT)
two points DerekDeadly Ernest | 07/09/2009 @ 08:45 PM (PDT)
Alton is in Southern Illinoisdaisyjane2007 | 06/30/2009 @ 09:27 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedi.t@... | 07/01/2009 @ 01:28 AM (PDT)
Not so sadj_eyon@... | 07/01/2009 @ 11:50 AM (PDT)
Personal accountabilityDavid@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:18 AM (PDT)
Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedgriff.computerservices@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:23 AM (PDT)
Reality CheckDavid@... | 07/04/2009 @ 05:40 AM (PDT)
it isjimdrvr99@... | 07/05/2009 @ 08:03 AM (PDT)
"Silly" to go on?deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 09:43 PM (PDT)
Dear Toni,j_eyon@... | 07/01/2009 @ 09:01 AM (PDT)
Wouldn't...TonytheTiger | 07/01/2009 @ 11:53 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedAyreWolf | 07/03/2009 @ 02:49 AM (PDT)
Then, what about Rediff site?Sarnath | 07/03/2009 @ 03:32 AM (PDT)
15 Minutes in the SunDavid@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:27 AM (PDT)
It's a very fine line indeed....chaz15 | 07/03/2009 @ 03:40 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedJBoushka@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:31 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedd_handler@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:38 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedalex.kashko@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:55 AM (PDT)
Ok, try your suggestion in the meat worldNickNielsen | 07/03/2009 @ 10:33 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealederiksblues@... | 07/03/2009 @ 05:02 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedmcarlton054@... | 07/03/2009 @ 05:34 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedbilly_bob_2455 | 07/03/2009 @ 06:03 AM (PDT)
You didn't mention one important thingmaggie.curran@... | 07/03/2009 @ 06:05 AM (PDT)
Freedom of speech is a right - anonymity is not!richallcorn | 07/03/2009 @ 07:11 AM (PDT)
anonymityID.10.T | 07/03/2009 @ 08:18 AM (PDT)
Agreedoneill.jd@... | 07/03/2009 @ 11:43 AM (PDT)
Key Observations: re: Woman Sues....ID.10.T | 07/03/2009 @ 08:04 AM (PDT)
observation #2djed | 07/03/2009 @ 02:28 PM (PDT)
There is No accusal of Sex offender hereID.10.T | 07/03/2009 @ 03:15 PM (PDT)
except there was no public indecency by the dress wearerDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 12:04 PM (PDT)
Try some facts related to court case and thread - like all theseDeadly Ernest | 07/04/2009 @ 12:01 PM (PDT)
Point Missed-Anonymity and opinion are privileges!BeltwayTech | 07/03/2009 @ 08:20 AM (PDT)
indecent exposureparkbench@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:57 AM (PDT)
Exactlyinet32@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:12 PM (PDT)
Freedom is dyingPOINTMAN8883@... | 07/03/2009 @ 08:23 AM (PDT)
Freedom is dyingjacobus57 | 07/03/2009 @ 08:33 AM (PDT)
Some people want their rights but forget their responsibilitiesafterhoursman@... | 07/03/2009 @ 08:44 AM (PDT)
Freedom is dyingPOINTMAN8883@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:55 AM (PDT)
RE: Freedom is dyinggpv527@... | 07/03/2009 @ 07:25 PM (PDT)
Nothing to do with freedom of speechinet32@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:20 PM (PDT)
Good postDavid@... | 07/05/2009 @ 05:47 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealeddeforeman@... | 07/03/2009 @ 08:45 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedinfohwyman@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:27 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedmycya4me@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:34 AM (PDT)
Real people, Real namesWUGeeks | 07/03/2009 @ 09:40 AM (PDT)
Real people, Real names - Mini-Skirt vs SPANDEXWPee | 07/03/2009 @ 10:49 AM (PDT)
Solution - Accept, review, possibly act - but don't postSteve Romero | 07/03/2009 @ 10:35 AM (PDT)
What about posting "fire" on a theatre's site?AlisaK2000@... | 07/03/2009 @ 11:55 AM (PDT)
Never give them your name...ever...mikifinaz1@... | 07/03/2009 @ 04:47 PM (PDT)
Thank God I don't live in the United Statesbigjude@... | 07/03/2009 @ 05:23 PM (PDT)
Evil gets Desprate cd613@... | 07/03/2009 @ 09:53 PM (PDT)
What do I think?JonathanX | 07/03/2009 @ 11:54 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedmchuntley1062@... | 07/04/2009 @ 07:19 AM (PDT)
This has come up before in Larry Sinclair v. Barack Obamanazcalito | 07/04/2009 @ 03:13 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedtorovictim | 07/04/2009 @ 04:39 PM (PDT)
Don't hide anythingtechrepublic@... | 07/04/2009 @ 07:18 PM (PDT)
Some of us need annonymity....JCitizen | 07/05/2009 @ 12:54 PM (PDT)
Can't contact you other than by replies here.OnTheRopes | 07/05/2009 @ 01:43 PM (PDT)
Prove it aint so.kjs420@... | 07/05/2009 @ 01:20 AM (PDT)
she doesn't need to, the other needs to prove she did itDeadly Ernest | 07/05/2009 @ 01:31 AM (PDT)
Day in courtjimdrvr99@... | 07/05/2009 @ 08:24 AM (PDT)
which I'm sure is matched by many others, the problem isDeadly Ernest | 07/05/2009 @ 12:28 PM (PDT)
The Problem Ernestalfielee@... | 07/05/2009 @ 08:27 PM (PDT)
I know all about how that sort of mud sticks, it got thrown at meDeadly Ernest | 07/05/2009 @ 09:53 PM (PDT)
So, because one might fail, no defense should be mounted?deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:43 PM (PDT)
Burden of proof rests with the person making the defamatory statement.deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 03:15 PM (PDT)
gone too far - at both ends!jedikitty@... | 07/05/2009 @ 01:29 PM (PDT)
The whole case was a retard incident and she dealt with itDeadly Ernest | 07/05/2009 @ 01:41 PM (PDT)
Could you PLEASE state WHERE it says that...vucliriel@... | 07/09/2009 @ 08:29 PM (PDT)
The post made by the anonymous poster - now removedDeadly Ernest | 07/10/2009 @ 12:06 AM (PDT)
When the site controls the content, yes.deepsand | 07/05/2009 @ 03:14 PM (PDT)
Insufficient dataDr_Zinj | 07/06/2009 @ 04:58 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedLeonard.Reinhart@... | 07/06/2009 @ 05:17 AM (PDT)
Would the real stupid please stand up?lpalermo@... | 07/06/2009 @ 06:09 AM (PDT)
Toni: Congratulations on a truly engaging and thoughtful blog entry!MikeG3b | 07/06/2009 @ 06:54 AM (PDT)
Toni Posts as Toni . . . sml@... | 07/06/2009 @ 07:52 AM (PDT)
I feel I have very good reasons to remain anonymous...JCitizen | 07/06/2009 @ 06:20 PM (PDT)
An excellent approach.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 07:55 PM (PDT)
Ha! HA! Good one! :^0JCitizen | 07/07/2009 @ 10:48 PM (PDT)
Anonymity? in what reality?vucliriel@... | 07/09/2009 @ 08:46 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealeddcolbert@... | 07/06/2009 @ 07:56 AM (PDT)
Freedom of speech? Really?dbecker@... | 07/06/2009 @ 08:12 AM (PDT)
Now this is a very interesting post becauseDeadly Ernest | 07/06/2009 @ 10:53 AM (PDT)
Very Well -- the problem of not having the papers right in front of medbecker@... | 07/06/2009 @ 01:06 PM (PDT)
A different answer is...dbecker@... | 07/06/2009 @ 01:11 PM (PDT)
You're missing an important distinction here.deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:49 PM (PDT)
I never saiddbecker@... | 07/07/2009 @ 07:18 AM (PDT)
As a matter of both Law and Fact, yes, it is.deepsand | 07/07/2009 @ 09:17 PM (PDT)
Why not host your own site?jdclyde | 07/07/2009 @ 09:52 PM (PDT)
And further more...dbecker@... | 07/07/2009 @ 07:22 AM (PDT)
That's a matter of Contract Law, not Civil Rights.deepsand | 07/07/2009 @ 09:36 PM (PDT)
will teach you next timejdclyde | 07/07/2009 @ 09:50 PM (PDT)
It's simple...JCitizen | 07/07/2009 @ 10:59 PM (PDT)
Freedom of Speechdcolbert@... | 07/09/2009 @ 06:03 AM (PDT)
The 1.1 Amendmentjcommunications@... | 07/06/2009 @ 09:37 AM (PDT)
A better rewrite:dbecker@... | 07/06/2009 @ 01:22 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedwoowoo095@... | 07/06/2009 @ 03:52 PM (PDT)
The salient concept here is "protected."deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:52 PM (PDT)
depends on prosecutionwoowoo095@... | 07/10/2009 @ 10:50 AM (PDT)
The speech on TR is not "free"NickNielsen | 07/10/2009 @ 12:56 PM (PDT)
No speech is truly "free" it comes with a cost.PsiFiScout | 07/11/2009 @ 09:57 AM (PDT)
Echo...echo...NickNielsen | 07/11/2009 @ 10:47 AM (PDT)
obviously there are guidlineswoowoo095@... | 07/13/2009 @ 09:33 AM (PDT)
Who you are matters littlePsiFiScout | 07/14/2009 @ 05:55 AM (PDT)
PFS this was NOT in a blog, but a comment on an articleDeadly Ernest | 07/14/2009 @ 06:16 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedYowye | 07/06/2009 @ 04:05 PM (PDT)
Are you saying that libel and slander should be explicitly legal?deepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 08:55 PM (PDT)
Seemssanteewelding | 07/06/2009 @ 08:58 PM (PDT)
Pogodeepsand | 07/06/2009 @ 10:54 PM (PDT)
Your right it is clearly illegal... But...Yowye | 07/09/2009 @ 08:25 AM (PDT)
One of the best examples of dealing with the mediaDeadly Ernest | 07/09/2009 @ 09:33 AM (PDT)
Thats really still a grey area.... and a mighty Big One!Yowye | 01/13/2010 @ 07:03 AM (PST)
what it pointed out was the hypocrasy of the interviewerDeadly Ernest | 01/13/2010 @ 12:23 PM (PST)
FREEDOM Vs Right to Prosecutethe_webninja@... | 07/07/2009 @ 04:06 AM (PDT)
Revolution?michaelsaltmarsh@... | 07/07/2009 @ 09:04 AM (PDT)
Ammo laws mostly inuendo...JCitizen | 07/07/2009 @ 11:11 PM (PDT)
Fire Arm Banmichaelsaltmarsh@... | 07/10/2009 @ 08:44 AM (PDT)
Oh yeah!...JCitizen | 07/10/2009 @ 10:05 PM (PDT)
Nice thought but faulty.PsiFiScout | 07/11/2009 @ 09:53 AM (PDT)
I think Hitler meantTonytheTiger | 07/15/2009 @ 02:07 PM (PDT)
Ulterior motiveOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 08:15 AM (PDT)
Plus we have the advantageTonytheTiger | 07/16/2009 @ 01:48 PM (PDT)
No, it's just the opposite for you guysOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 02:45 PM (PDT)
Opinions should not be anonymousharrylal | 07/07/2009 @ 07:12 AM (PDT)
that's best handled through moderation before display - Deadly Ernest | 07/07/2009 @ 08:06 AM (PDT)
Not true - why does blog change our standardtbostwick@... | 07/13/2009 @ 11:31 AM (PDT)
So you expect the ISP or the site owner to act as Censor?PsiFiScout | 07/14/2009 @ 06:18 AM (PDT)
the site owner has the legal right and responsibility to ensureDeadly Ernest | 07/14/2009 @ 06:32 AM (PDT)
Newspaperizzy_again | 07/07/2009 @ 11:13 AM (PDT)
On the other hand..JCitizen | 07/07/2009 @ 11:21 PM (PDT)
One of the other reports on this shows she didn't go to theDeadly Ernest | 07/09/2009 @ 09:36 AM (PDT)
Perhaps they were afraid the coward would sue them...JCitizen | 07/11/2009 @ 08:13 AM (PDT)
I think this will eventually establish, via the courts,Deadly Ernest | 07/11/2009 @ 08:46 AM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedtbostwick@... | 07/13/2009 @ 11:19 AM (PDT)
Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedtbostwick@... | 07/13/2009 @ 11:23 AM (PDT)
Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealed - Btbostwick@... | 07/13/2009 @ 11:28 AM (PDT)
Agreed in principlePsiFiScout | 07/14/2009 @ 06:11 AM (PDT)
I suggest you go back and talk to the judges as the court case hasDeadly Ernest | 07/14/2009 @ 06:36 AM (PDT)
Dangerous precedenttbostwick@... | 07/15/2009 @ 01:41 PM (PDT)
This isn't a precedence as such, as all the primary ingredients haveDeadly Ernest | 07/15/2009 @ 02:30 PM (PDT)
I don't know where you came up with this total BSDeadly Ernest | 07/13/2009 @ 02:51 PM (PDT)
Maybe down under, but not herePsiFiScout | 07/14/2009 @ 06:30 AM (PDT)
it also apllies in the US - there is a difference between them havingDeadly Ernest | 07/14/2009 @ 06:42 AM (PDT)
I would but I won'tOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 10:50 AM (PDT)
Not really...PsiFiScout | 07/14/2009 @ 05:58 AM (PDT)
but that information must be given up when the courts require itDeadly Ernest | 07/14/2009 @ 06:18 AM (PDT)
Anonymous my arse, regardless of what their website saysOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 11:07 AM (PDT)
Hey OZ, my understanding of posts etc here is that I give themDeadly Ernest | 07/16/2009 @ 11:32 AM (PDT)
You can use it but don't hold IP rights with respect to TR's use of it.Oz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 11:39 AM (PDT)
Are the note explains why I was having trouble making sense of Deadly Ernest | 07/16/2009 @ 01:24 PM (PDT)
Me tooOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 02:53 PM (PDT)
Yes, really.Oz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 10:55 AM (PDT)
Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revelaedbill.fuller@... | 07/13/2009 @ 01:42 PM (PDT)
Very True...butPsiFiScout | 07/14/2009 @ 06:20 AM (PDT)
actually, the action does have a basis in law - the right to know andDeadly Ernest | 07/14/2009 @ 06:37 AM (PDT)
If that were trueTonytheTiger | 07/15/2009 @ 02:13 PM (PDT)
The person committed an act of libel - he public accussed her of a crimeDeadly Ernest | 07/15/2009 @ 03:11 PM (PDT)
Her only problemOz_Media | 07/15/2009 @ 04:19 PM (PDT)
She may want it to take a whileNickNielsen | 07/15/2009 @ 05:24 PM (PDT)
Could beOz_Media | 07/15/2009 @ 09:19 PM (PDT)
Personally, I don't think she's after much more than actualDeadly Ernest | 07/16/2009 @ 12:05 AM (PDT)
Then she's dreamingOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 08:11 AM (PDT)
Oz, from what I've seen of the reports on this, two of the thingsDeadly Ernest | 07/16/2009 @ 11:22 AM (PDT)
What I find amusingOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 11:32 AM (PDT)
Too right mate. A few years back I did a business law courseDeadly Ernest | 07/16/2009 @ 11:45 AM (PDT)
It's similar here tooOz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 12:57 PM (PDT)
Comment on the Justice Systemvucliriel@... | 07/17/2009 @ 08:06 AM (PDT)
The world hates us?Oz_Media | 07/17/2009 @ 08:31 AM (PDT)
@The world hates us?vucliriel@... | 07/18/2009 @ 11:47 AM (PDT)
On your commentsOz_Media | 07/20/2009 @ 01:46 PM (PDT)
What about fair play?????bigjude@... | 07/15/2009 @ 03:38 PM (PDT)
You have more freedom than American press does.Oz_Media | 07/16/2009 @ 08:40 AM (PDT)
The Last Wordbigjude@... | 07/19/2009 @ 06:51 PM (PDT)
Judy, there are other females in the forum and some did comment toDeadly Ernest | 07/19/2009 @ 07:10 PM (PDT)
That her detractors here are men is irrelevant to meNickNielsen | 07/19/2009 @ 07:13 PM (PDT)
Even on the firearms issue this may be true...JCitizen | 07/20/2009 @ 09:46 PM (PDT)
Hi JudyOz_Media | 07/21/2009 @ 09:12 AM (PDT)
Highly morally judgementalOz_Media | 07/21/2009 @ 09:28 AM (PDT)
JCitizen, on armsOz_Media | 07/21/2009 @ 09:40 AM (PDT)
Hi Ozzie! Makes sense to me...JCitizen | 07/21/2009 @ 09:35 PM (PDT)
Nice to live in Canada!Oz_Media | 07/15/2009 @ 02:45 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedezrabm@... | 07/22/2009 @ 10:53 PM (PDT)
RE: Woman sues to have name of anonymous web poster revealedmjstelly | 12/31/2009 @ 08:03 AM (PST)

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Browse by Tag

networking
Popular tags: windows,  software,  hardware,  security,  it management
e-mail
Popular tags: windows,  software,  networking,  security,  hardware
hardware
Popular tags: windows,  software,  networking,  it management,  security
programming
Popular tags: software,  windows,  networking,  hardware,  it management
software
Popular tags: windows,  hardware,  networking,  programming,  it management
windows
Popular tags: software,  networking,  hardware,  security,  it management
linux
Popular tags: software,  windows,  networking,  hardware,  security
it management
Popular tags: networking,  windows,  software,  security,  hardware
career
Popular tags: it management,  networking,  software,  windows,  feedback
security
Popular tags: networking,  windows,  software,  it management,  hardware
off-topic
Popular tags: software,  windows,  hardware,  feedback,  networking
feedback
Popular tags: software,  windows,  hardware,  networking,  it management
project management
Popular tags: it management,  software,  networking,  windows,  programming
Administrator's Guide to TCP/IP, Second Edition
Maintain your critical TCP/IP system and ensure reliable, safe remote access. Get the expert advice and solutions to handle Windows networking, Cisco routing, documentation, and troubleshooting.
Buy Now
IT Professional's Guide to Policies and Procedures, Third Ed
Whether you're creating policies for management, training, personnel, support, privacy, Internet/e-mail usage, security, or inventory, you'll meet the needs of your entire enterprise with this one download!
Buy Now

Popular Sanity Saver Videos