|
Can porn spam be concidered Sexual Harassment to employees?sostermann@... | 04/05/2006 @ 12:32 PM (PDT) |
 The answer is yes and nojmgarvin | 04/05/2006 @ 12:59 PM (PDT) |
 butDr Dij | 04/06/2006 @ 02:40 PM (PDT) |
|
What is harassmentArtGal | 04/07/2006 @ 05:35 AM (PDT) |
|
Wrong answer jmgarvin! Porn spam IS Sexual HarassmentScoid | 04/07/2006 @ 09:57 AM (PDT) |
|
Another Wiring Closet Lawyersprdave32 | 04/08/2006 @ 05:29 AM (PDT) |
 Holy Mackerel!Scoid | 04/08/2006 @ 01:42 PM (PDT) |
 If the person was incompetent...~Omega~ | 04/10/2006 @ 08:23 AM (PDT) |
|
Depends on where you livemgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 10:36 AM (PDT) |
|
I whole-heartedly agree, boot 'em if you can. I...SilentBob | 04/11/2006 @ 02:13 PM (PDT) |
|
Didn't mean it to sound so harshsprdave32 | 04/13/2006 @ 05:44 PM (PDT) |
|
If they were truly incompetentTonytheTiger | 04/14/2006 @ 01:14 PM (PDT) |
|
Simple Solutionmarkml@... | 04/14/2006 @ 02:29 PM (PDT) |
|
you know your a cry babythetracker1099@... | 04/08/2006 @ 10:32 PM (PDT) |
|
I Agree with You and George Carlin!Scoid | 04/09/2006 @ 12:45 PM (PDT) |
|
McDonald's case.coolrobc | 04/10/2006 @ 09:20 AM (PDT) |
|
define 'harassment'dlmeyer@... | 04/10/2006 @ 09:36 AM (PDT) |
|
"FWIW: if an employee raised such a complaint t...coolrobc | 04/10/2006 @ 01:09 PM (PDT) |
|
Yes ... AND No!dlmeyer@... | 04/10/2006 @ 08:18 AM (PDT) |
|
A Mac...??sprdave32 | 04/13/2006 @ 05:58 PM (PDT) |
|
No, I do not believe it.mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 10:19 AM (PDT) |
|
So...gizzymogremlin | 04/13/2006 @ 04:00 AM (PDT) |
|
20 years ago, I told people this is where this would be goingJohnMcGrew@... | 04/13/2006 @ 04:58 AM (PDT) |
|
Quite the contrary (unfortunately)daveo2000 | 04/13/2006 @ 06:32 AM (PDT) |
|
NonsenseJohnMcGrew@... | 04/13/2006 @ 01:44 PM (PDT) |
|
Sadly, I'm not sure which laws you refer to...daveo2000 | 04/17/2006 @ 04:43 AM (PDT) |
|
The laws to which I refer...JohnMcGrew@... | 05/05/2006 @ 04:09 AM (PDT) |
|
John M.--you are sooooooo rightjacksdaddy1@... | 04/13/2006 @ 02:10 PM (PDT) |
|
Redirect the blame?nicholson.eric@... | 04/11/2006 @ 10:38 AM (PDT) |
|
Ideally, yes... butdaveo2000 | 04/13/2006 @ 06:40 AM (PDT) |
|
Letter to the Workplace Inboxschwana | 04/11/2006 @ 06:04 PM (PDT) |
|
Good grief, just how bad are your filters?DC Guy | 04/05/2006 @ 01:11 PM (PDT) |
|
JurisdictionsJamesRL | 04/05/2006 @ 02:14 PM (PDT) |
|
I have to wonderToo Old For IT | 04/06/2006 @ 09:55 AM (PDT) |
|
never heard of it before but worth a try, along with no-ip.com service...UncleRob | 04/06/2006 @ 09:22 PM (PDT) |
|
Fire her. this is the best solution because it ...chris.tann@... | 04/05/2006 @ 02:57 PM (PDT) |
|
not so fastdawgit | 04/05/2006 @ 03:13 PM (PDT) |
|
Reminds me of when ...Too Old For IT | 04/06/2006 @ 09:59 AM (PDT) |
|
Fire her? No way.Let her grow up!michael_orton@... | 04/06/2006 @ 05:30 AM (PDT) |
|
Not soOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 09:50 AM (PDT) |
|
False +Jellimonsta | 04/06/2006 @ 08:30 PM (PDT) |
|
Zip zippo nilOz_Media | 04/10/2006 @ 10:18 AM (PDT) |
|
If you have to check quaratine daily...mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 11:44 AM (PDT) |
|
yes sosasiv | 04/10/2006 @ 06:25 AM (PDT) |
|
Yes so, read it this timeOz_Media | 04/10/2006 @ 10:22 AM (PDT) |
|
http://www.bluebottle.net/thestorys@... | 04/11/2006 @ 05:37 AM (PDT) |
|
HOW completely wrong you areOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 09:46 AM (PDT) |
|
Must be different in Oz, but here in Ohio ...Too Old For IT | 04/06/2006 @ 10:00 AM (PDT) |
|
First of all you are wrong:Oz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 10:12 AM (PDT) |
|
Dear EinsteinRNR1995@... | 04/10/2006 @ 06:16 AM (PDT) |
|
Liste to what you just said....Einstein, LOL! :DOz_Media | 04/10/2006 @ 10:37 AM (PDT) |
|
Bad analogy.mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 12:17 PM (PDT) |
|
Land of OZRNR1995@... | 06/15/2006 @ 09:01 AM (PDT) |
|
Not if there is a company handbook/policydavid.pennington@... | 04/11/2006 @ 06:35 AM (PDT) |
|
Not hereJamesRL | 04/06/2006 @ 10:16 AM (PDT) |
|
Just another reason working in Canada is betterOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 10:31 AM (PDT) |
|
But what do you really get?mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 12:26 PM (PDT) |
|
90 day probationary period for new employees...UncleRob | 04/06/2006 @ 09:19 PM (PDT) |
|
True in Ontario but is it ethical?oldbag | 04/07/2006 @ 08:42 AM (PDT) |
|
Investigate and actwizardtranslations@... | 04/10/2006 @ 04:38 AM (PDT) |
|
common sense vs. pissing contestsjacksdaddy1@... | 04/13/2006 @ 02:50 PM (PDT) |
|
Down here, viability of wrongful discharge suit would depend on the state.deepsand | 04/11/2006 @ 11:33 AM (PDT) |
|
do please be aware of vastly different jurisdictionsmgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 11:49 AM (PDT) |
|
oh yeah - thats the way to avoid a lawsuitShawn_W | 04/06/2006 @ 10:27 AM (PDT) |
|
Fire her for....inspector3500@... | 04/10/2006 @ 07:26 AM (PDT) |
|
You're prime for a lawsuitblarman | 04/10/2006 @ 08:43 AM (PDT) |
|
its got nothing to do with not respecting womensasiv | 04/11/2006 @ 08:39 AM (PDT) |
|
You've obviously never been a partyblarman | 04/20/2006 @ 07:31 AM (PDT) |
|
YES.!.dawgit | 04/05/2006 @ 03:07 PM (PDT) |
|
What law?gralfus | 04/06/2006 @ 09:01 AM (PDT) |
|
depends on locationdawgit | 04/06/2006 @ 09:15 AM (PDT) |
|
Glad we aren't SOXToo Old For IT | 04/06/2006 @ 10:04 AM (PDT) |
|
unfortunatly :-(dawgit | 04/06/2006 @ 10:23 AM (PDT) |
|
SOX does not cover every businessfaradhi | 04/06/2006 @ 11:21 AM (PDT) |
|
There's one for you too..dawgit | 04/06/2006 @ 01:02 PM (PDT) |
|
Regulations Yes. SOX Nofaradhi | 04/06/2006 @ 02:16 PM (PDT) |
|
SOX pertains to publicly traded companiesmgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 12:32 PM (PDT) |
|
That would beOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 09:52 AM (PDT) |
|
Postinibschaettle@... | 04/07/2006 @ 08:45 AM (PDT) |
|
There are programsdawgit | 04/05/2006 @ 03:21 PM (PDT) |
|
at the very least, swap outlook express for another free email client...UncleRob | 04/06/2006 @ 09:26 PM (PDT) |
|
Can't affordDouble DeBo | 04/13/2006 @ 03:10 AM (PDT) |
|
Thank yousostermann@... | 04/05/2006 @ 06:12 PM (PDT) |
|
Don't Fall For itjc2it | 04/06/2006 @ 09:46 AM (PDT) |
|
CA's spam filerToo Old For IT | 04/06/2006 @ 10:07 AM (PDT) |
|
Beating a dead horsemgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 12:36 PM (PDT) |
|
No!zlitocook@... | 04/05/2006 @ 06:15 PM (PDT) |
|
Legal DecisiontEA-TiME | 04/05/2006 @ 06:42 PM (PDT) |
|
Of course you're at fault.Absolutely | 04/06/2006 @ 02:57 AM (PDT) |
|
I agreesMoRTy71 | 04/06/2006 @ 05:47 AM (PDT) |
|
I'm not a legal expert eitherAbsolutely | 04/06/2006 @ 05:53 PM (PDT) |
|
question...UncleRob | 04/06/2006 @ 09:02 PM (PDT) |
|
Not the company's responsibility...wizardtranslations@... | 04/10/2006 @ 05:00 AM (PDT) |
|
Out-sourcing doesn't discharge yourob mekel | 04/06/2006 @ 06:23 AM (PDT) |
|
Out-sourcing?Absolutely | 04/06/2006 @ 06:09 PM (PDT) |
|
Depends on the contract.rob mekel | 04/07/2006 @ 12:43 AM (PDT) |
|
1 Linux mail serverAbsolutely | 04/07/2006 @ 06:57 PM (PDT) |
|
It is very unlikelyrob mekel | 04/10/2006 @ 02:17 AM (PDT) |
|
don't be so quick...UncleRob | 04/06/2006 @ 03:01 PM (PDT) |
|
Been there, done that.Bassplayer and Drummer | 04/06/2006 @ 06:22 AM (PDT) |
|
Familiarsostermann@... | 04/06/2006 @ 07:00 AM (PDT) |
|
CorrectionOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 09:55 AM (PDT) |
|
On the contrary...Bassplayer and Drummer | 04/06/2006 @ 12:35 PM (PDT) |
|
As I was typing!Bassplayer and Drummer | 04/06/2006 @ 12:58 PM (PDT) |
|
~fallow~sostermann@... | 04/06/2006 @ 01:17 PM (PDT) |
|
People only read every third or forth wordmjwx | 04/10/2006 @ 01:31 AM (PDT) |
|
Kinda missed my pointOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 01:52 PM (PDT) |
|
Kinda missed my point, too...Bassplayer and Drummer | 04/07/2006 @ 06:41 AM (PDT) |
|
Cull the herd, eh?mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 12:44 PM (PDT) |
|
WHAA WHAA!!!jkaras | 04/06/2006 @ 07:30 AM (PDT) |
|
Ouch! You cannot be serious...UKviking | 04/10/2006 @ 03:31 AM (PDT) |
|
Unfortunately yesjkaras | 04/10/2006 @ 06:17 AM (PDT) |
|
well saidsasiv | 04/10/2006 @ 06:50 AM (PDT) |
|
No offence taken!UKviking | 04/10/2006 @ 07:38 AM (PDT) |
|
deep do-do if... Guaranteed.!.dawgit | 04/06/2006 @ 07:50 AM (PDT) |
|
You are definitely not a lawyer.Shawn_W | 04/06/2006 @ 10:46 AM (PDT) |
|
That is correctdawgit | 04/06/2006 @ 01:12 PM (PDT) |
|
yes and heres whywithu_naheartbeat@... | 04/06/2006 @ 08:42 AM (PDT) |
|
No you don'tOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 10:10 AM (PDT) |
|
Yes it IS, not CAN, but ISOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 09:29 AM (PDT) |
|
yeb, in much country's the samerob mekel | 04/10/2006 @ 02:21 AM (PDT) |
|
Simple Changescitiboi | 04/10/2006 @ 04:35 PM (PDT) |
|
Agreed BUT...mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 01:02 PM (PDT) |
|
Just wonderingTonytheTiger | 04/14/2006 @ 01:20 PM (PDT) |
|
Circumstantial DependanceAaron A Baker | 04/06/2006 @ 10:27 AM (PDT) |
|
DepndanceOz_Media | 04/06/2006 @ 11:20 AM (PDT) |
|
Was not awareAaron A Baker | 04/09/2006 @ 10:31 AM (PDT) |
|
How new is Relatively new?reconlabtech | 04/06/2006 @ 12:24 PM (PDT) |
|
3-4 monthssostermann@... | 04/06/2006 @ 12:45 PM (PDT) |
|
on her part, also on.... Check this out, please!dawgit | 04/06/2006 @ 01:46 PM (PDT) |
|
No Wonder!reconlabtech | 04/07/2006 @ 07:04 AM (PDT) |
|
Have you triedDr Dij | 04/06/2006 @ 02:30 PM (PDT) |
|
a few things...UncleRob | 04/06/2006 @ 02:51 PM (PDT) |
|
check out SpamFighter's website ....UncleRob | 04/06/2006 @ 09:42 PM (PDT) |
|
No OpinionMrFurry | 04/07/2006 @ 01:49 AM (PDT) |
|
No fun for you, come back one year!mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 01:12 PM (PDT) |
|
Show willing - take it seriouslyPoggle | 04/07/2006 @ 02:33 AM (PDT) |
|
Try Microsoft Outlook 2003sdurfee@... | 04/07/2006 @ 05:04 AM (PDT) |
|
apparently they don't have funds for this type of purchase..UncleRob | 04/07/2006 @ 07:15 AM (PDT) |
|
Best effortJcritch | 04/07/2006 @ 05:22 AM (PDT) |
|
Find a host with Spam Assassintrafficjon | 04/07/2006 @ 06:16 AM (PDT) |
|
Need some statisticsCactus Pete | 04/07/2006 @ 10:16 AM (PDT) |
|
Why !AndyW360 | 04/10/2006 @ 02:38 AM (PDT) |
|
It's counter productive no matter whatDanLM | 04/10/2006 @ 04:50 AM (PDT) |
|
Wa Wa WaRNR1995@... | 04/10/2006 @ 06:01 AM (PDT) |
|
depends upon the local lawsDeadly Ernest | 04/10/2006 @ 08:51 AM (PDT) |
|
porn and the lawgeezer51@... | 04/10/2006 @ 12:53 PM (PDT) |
|
Well what has happened since 4/5/06UncleRob | 04/10/2006 @ 03:07 PM (PDT) |
|
yea, Im curious tooDanLM | 04/10/2006 @ 03:26 PM (PDT) |
|
Actionsostermann@... | 04/11/2006 @ 06:07 AM (PDT) |
|
Late to the Party...SilentBob | 04/11/2006 @ 01:29 PM (PDT) |
|
Give in to a childjacksdaddy1@... | 04/11/2006 @ 03:21 PM (PDT) |
|
For a Whilejamas@... | 04/11/2006 @ 09:35 PM (PDT) |
|
Want an easy fix to your problem?jwinborne@... | 04/10/2006 @ 06:08 PM (PDT) |
|
This has to be the best reply yetDanLM | 04/10/2006 @ 10:50 PM (PDT) |
|
Reasonable efforts come into playjrwkprice | 04/11/2006 @ 06:36 AM (PDT) |
|
80 Percent False Positivesmgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 01:27 PM (PDT) |
|
JAFOnpbwbass | 04/20/2006 @ 11:26 AM (PDT) |
|
One way to make things clear: signed agreement before turning on filteringdw@... | 04/11/2006 @ 07:25 AM (PDT) |
|
Not exactly harassmentmhambrecht@... | 04/11/2006 @ 10:25 AM (PDT) |
|
No more responsible than the Postal Carrier is ...deepsand | 04/11/2006 @ 10:43 AM (PDT) |
|
ANYTHING is possible.mgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 10:44 AM (PDT) |
|
Fail to see the CulpabilitySilentBob | 04/11/2006 @ 01:17 PM (PDT) |
|
Yes, it is an inherited email addressmgordon@... | 04/11/2006 @ 01:40 PM (PDT) |
|
Hrm...SilentBob | 04/11/2006 @ 02:01 PM (PDT) |
|
spam-sexual harrassment????jacksdaddy1@... | 04/11/2006 @ 02:56 PM (PDT) |
|
This needs a lawyers attention + Some Lovinjamas@... | 04/11/2006 @ 03:02 PM (PDT) |
|
Don't think sodcooke@... | 04/12/2006 @ 07:16 AM (PDT) |
|
How can nearly ALL of you miss the obvious???!!!bill@... | 04/12/2006 @ 08:33 AM (PDT) |
|
the obvious ..metro_au | 04/13/2006 @ 01:03 AM (PDT) |
|
define something that 'holds up'...noyoki | 04/13/2006 @ 05:28 AM (PDT) |
|
You totally missed it?bill@... | 04/13/2006 @ 10:17 AM (PDT) |
|
ALWAYS HAS???jamas@... | 04/13/2006 @ 09:27 PM (PDT) |
|
Thank-you jamasnoyoki | 04/14/2006 @ 08:58 AM (PDT) |
|
Where does he live?noyoki | 04/14/2006 @ 09:07 AM (PDT) |
|
SPAM filter from the Manager's budgetwrlang@... | 04/13/2006 @ 04:33 AM (PDT) |
|
Sexual Harrassment? Sure. Company liable? Definitely not.Daniel.Muzrall | 04/13/2006 @ 06:07 AM (PDT) |
|
Liability...of course.ncrum@... | 04/13/2006 @ 08:46 AM (PDT) |
|
Liability...of course.ncrum@... | 04/13/2006 @ 08:46 AM (PDT) |
|
What planet is this person from???Lando56 | 04/13/2006 @ 11:30 AM (PDT) |
|
What is "false" about it?noyoki | 04/14/2006 @ 09:03 AM (PDT) |
|
Two suggestions for youtechrepublic@... | 04/16/2006 @ 06:08 PM (PDT) |
|
Send a note to your manager with cc to the ladyjsargent | 05/05/2006 @ 12:50 AM (PDT) |
|
Do your best.jsargent | 05/05/2006 @ 01:13 AM (PDT) |
|
Call it "stalking" not harassment.Absolutely | 06/29/2007 @ 06:35 PM (PDT) |
|
I have a Better Question!!! Can the Company Promoted in the Spam Be heald Rhonuheroes | 08/01/2009 @ 06:53 PM (PDT) |
